Lines change, recur, ramble, relate, avoid, orbit, and flip flop.
By graphing their alphabet sequence, words layout, erect, and animate--
they mystifyingly reassemble thematic associations.

The rigor of this method prevents arbitrary choices or adjustments.
Written words were not reasoned, anything sensible should reappear randomly
--expecting logical concurrence seems ridiculous.
Yet, do these signs depict jagged jumbles of discombobulated chaos?
Is this assortment altogether askew or are the diagrams attendant
to some attachment with meaning?
The result is somewhat inexplicable; however, the link is certain:
language is curled and bent to replicate an intuitive process.

"Open", "unopen", and "reopen" reconstruct an allegorical contrast and variation.
No awkward or ambiguous random-walk could draw an axial design
or invent "even" and "uneven".
No fluky occurrence could envisage an ideogram that clearly resembles
regular correspondences that appreciably coincide.
No stochastic alternative could overcome the extent of measured coincidence
provided by the like-minded sizes, vacant spaces, and unbelievable affinity.

These shapes are lexical structures which recall innate, appellative behavior.
Instinctively, we evoke and fulfill an attunement to something magical
which is void of artifice and empty of studied opinion.